Did director fracture history with Selma?


Rolling Stone interview with Ava DuVernay
Rolling Stone: Let's talk about reducing LBJ's role in the events you depict in the film.

Every filmmaker imbues a movie with their own point of view. The script was the LBJ/King thing, but originally, it was much more slanted to Johnson. I wasn't interested in making a white-savior movie; I was interested in making a movie centered on the people of Selma. You have to bring in some context for what it was like to live in the racial terrorism that was going on in the deep south at that time. The four little girls have to be there, and then you have to bring in the women. So I started adding women.

This is a dramatization of the events. But what's important for me as a student of this time in history is to not deify what the president did. Johnson has been hailed as a hero of that time, and he was, but we're talking about a reluctant hero. He was cajoled and pushed, he was protective of a legacy — he was not doing things out of the goodness of his heart. Does it make it any worse or any better? I don't think so. History is history and he did do it eventually. But there was some process to it that was important to show.

HBC: Not particularly a friend of LBJ; however, she went overboard with this. Artistic license, yes when creating characters from Selma. Not on who made this happen. LBJ did that big-time, and it was one of his greatest accomplishments. 


Read more: 
http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/features/ava-duvernay-on-making-selma-20150105#ixzz3P8lOoN00
Follow us: 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Remembering the toughest loss I ever experienced in approximately a quarter-century of coaching football. George Pasierb was a great coaching adversary.

Why did Tennessee-Chattanooga hire trainer Tim Bream despite his role in the alcohol-induced death of Tim Piazza at a Penn State frat?

Why did Mike Tomlin start hiring black coaches after 15 years?